Loading mutual fund details…
Union Large & Midcap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option is an equity scheme managed by Union Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 18.66%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 16.42% and 21.49% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 0 of the last 2 reported years. The total expense ratio is 1.62% on assets of ₹920Cr. The fund is currently managed by Vinod Malviya, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Blend on the 3x3 equity style box, with 89% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| HDFC BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 3.31% |
| ICICI BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 3.13% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Energy | 3.00% |
| THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 2.72% |
| Shriram Finance Limited | Financial Services | 2.59% |
| STATE BANK OF INDIA | Financial Services | 2.47% |
| MAX FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED | Financial Services | 2.41% |
| BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED | Communication Services | 2.09% |
| BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED | Industrials | 2.02% |
| FORTIS HEALTHCARE LIMITED. | Healthcare | 1.99% |
| JSW ENERGY LIMITED | Utilities | 1.97% |
| LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED | Industrials | 1.92% |
| CG POWER AND INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED | Industrials | 1.86% |
| SOLAR INDUSTRIES INDIA LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.77% |
| THE PHOENIX MILLS LIMITED | Real Estate | 1.67% |
| AXIS BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.53% |
| UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.52% |
| AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.49% |
| GABRIEL INDIA LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.48% |
| TATA CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.47% |
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.46% |
| TVS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.44% |
| AMBER ENTERPRISES INDIA LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.41% |
| MARICO LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.37% |
| J.K.CEMENT LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.37% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 11 | 30.57% |
| Capital Goods | — | 13.30% |
| Healthcare | 6 | 10.41% |
| Automobile and Auto Components | — | 8.86% |
| Chemicals | — | 5.00% |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | — | 3.80% |
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 3.53% |
| Information Technology | — | 3.32% |
| Consumer Durables | — | 2.90% |
| Metals & Mining | — | 2.81% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -6.11% | 4.74% | 15.60% | 34.96% | 69.18% | 93.6% |
| 3Y | 11.46% | 16.42% | 18.66% | 21.49% | 27.67% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 13.25% | 16.01% | 18.79% | 21.51% | 25.14% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 25.7% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
What an investor SIPping into this fund actually got during named market shocks.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|