Loading mutual fund details…
Sundaram Value Fund Direct Plan - Growth is an equity scheme managed by Sundaram Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 15.88%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 13.34% and 18.28% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 0 of the last 2 reported years. The total expense ratio is 1.65% on assets of ₹1,323Cr. The fund is currently managed by Shalav Saket, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Value on the 3x3 equity style box, with 92% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| HDFC BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 6.78% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Energy | 5.89% |
| ICICI BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 5.05% |
| AXIS BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 4.60% |
| STATE BANK OF INDIA | Financial Services | 4.28% |
| NTPC LIMITED | Utilities | 3.67% |
| INFOSYS LIMITED | Technology | 3.57% |
| BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED | Communication Services | 3.42% |
| KIRLOSKAR OIL ENGINES LIMITED | Industrials | 3.29% |
| LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED | Industrials | 3.12% |
| FORCE MOTORS LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 2.97% |
| ITC LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 2.88% |
| Varun Beverages Ltd | Consumer Defensive | 2.34% |
| ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.22% |
| GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED | Utilities | 2.10% |
| UNION BANK OF INDIA | Financial Services | 1.93% |
| INDUSIND BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.87% |
| POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED | Utilities | 1.85% |
| Sapphire Foods India Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 1.83% |
| EMAMI LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.78% |
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.61% |
| AMBUJA CEMENTS LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.56% |
| TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED | Technology | 1.40% |
| WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.37% |
| CIPLA LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.36% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 7 | 25.54% |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | — | 13.40% |
| Information Technology | — | 7.77% |
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 7.53% |
| Capital Goods | — | 6.75% |
| Automobile and Auto Components | — | 6.27% |
| Power | — | 5.52% |
| Construction Materials | — | 5.29% |
| Healthcare | 3 | 4.15% |
| Consumer Services | — | 4.04% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -4.74% | 5.47% | 12.59% | 26.77% | 67.59% | 94.9% |
| 3Y | 9.57% | 13.34% | 15.88% | 18.28% | 27.01% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 10.34% | 13.06% | 16.96% | 19.58% | 22.90% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 43.7% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
What an investor SIPping into this fund actually got during named market shocks.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 3 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|
| Axis Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Axis Mutual Fund | ₹1,533 Cr | 1.04% | +20.15% | — | 5★ |
| DSP Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | DSP Mutual Fund | ₹1,484 Cr | 1.02% | +19.72% | +15.18% | 5★ |
| ITI Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | ITI Mutual Fund | ₹353 Cr | 0.70% | +16.97% | — | 3★ |
| Union Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Union Mutual Fund | ₹373 Cr | 1.83% | +16.20% | +14.86% | 4★ |
| Union Value Fund - Direct Plan - IDCW Option | Union Mutual Fund | ₹373 Cr | 1.83% | +16.20% | +14.86% | 4★ |
| Groww Value Fund (formerly known as Indiabulls Value Fund) - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Groww Mutual Fund | ₹67 Cr | 1.35% | +15.68% | +13.57% | 4★ |
| UTI Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | UTI Mutual Fund | ₹9,433 Cr | 1.52% | +15.08% | +13.23% | 3★ |
| ITI Value Fund - Direct Plan - IDCW Option | ITI Mutual Fund | ₹353 Cr | 0.70% | +14.86% | — | 3★ |
| Canara Robeco Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Canara Robeco Mutual Fund | ₹1,267 Cr | 0.73% | +13.98% | — | 3★ |
| Bandhan Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Bandhan Mutual Fund | ₹9,908 Cr | 1.58% | +13.55% | +15.56% | 3★ |