Loading mutual fund details…
Nippon India Conservative Hybrid Fund-Growth Plan is a hybrid scheme managed by Nippon India Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 8.32%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 7.98% and 9.08% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 5 of the last 12 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 1.90% on assets of ₹951Cr. The fund is currently managed by Dhrumil Shah, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
| Holding | Sector | Weight |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| 7.03% State Government Securities | SOVEREIGN | 5.22% |
| 9.75% Delhi International Airport Limited | ICRA AA | 3.81% |
| 8.55% Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited | CRISIL AA | 3.65% |
| 5% GMR Airports Limited | CRISIL A+ | 3.50% |
| 10.96% Gaursons India Private Limited | ICRA A- | 3.44% |
| 7.1% Government of India | SOVEREIGN | 3.21% |
| 10.2% Navi Finserv Limited | FITCH A | 3.14% |
| Auxilo Finserve Private Limited | CRISIL A+ | 3.14% |
| 10.4% Muthoot Fincorp Ltd | CRISIL AA- | 3.13% |
| 8.28% Suryapet Khammam Road Pvt Ltd | CARE AAA | 2.91% |
| 9.25% Truhome Finance Limited | CRISIL AA | 2.66% |
| 9.5% Vedanta Limited | ICRA AA | 2.65% |
| 8.45% Adani Airport Holdings Limited | CRISIL AA- | 2.64% |
| 9.95% Hiranandani Financial Services Private Limited | CARE A+ | 2.63% |
| 8% Adani Power Limited | CRISIL AA | 2.61% |
| JSW Kalinga Steel Limited | CRISIL AA | 2.61% |
| 7.17% Mindspace Business Parks REIT | ICRA AAA | 2.59% |
| 6.57% State Government Securities | SOVEREIGN | 2.55% |
| 8.28% Mancherial Repallewada Road Private Limited | CARE AAA | 2.52% |
| 8.44% Renew Solar Energy (Jharkhand Five) Private Ltd | CARE AA | 2.42% |
| JTPM Metal Traders Limited | CRISIL AA | 2.20% |
| 10.81% Bamboo Hotel And Global Centre (Delhi) Private limited | ICRA A+(CE) | 1.80% |
| Brookfield India Real Estate Trust | Realty | 1.75% |
| 7.7% Adani Transmission Step-Two Limited | CRISIL AA+ | 1.57% |
| Trust Investment Advisors Private Limited | CARE A1+ | 1.55% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| CRISIL AA | 7 | 15.20% |
| SOVEREIGN | 5 | 12.53% |
| CRISIL A+ | 2 | 6.64% |
| ICRA AA | 2 | 6.46% |
| CRISIL AA- | 3 | 5.98% |
| Realty | 4 | 5.53% |
| CARE AAA | 2 | 5.43% |
| Banks | 7 | 3.85% |
| ICRA A- | 1 | 3.44% |
| FITCH A | 1 | 3.14% |
| CARE AA | 2 | 2.71% |
| CARE A+ | 1 | 2.63% |
| ICRA AAA | 1 | 2.59% |
| Transport Infrastructure | 2 | 1.88% |
| ICRA A+(CE) | 1 | 1.80% |
| CRISIL AA+ | 1 | 1.57% |
| CARE A1+ | 1 | 1.55% |
| FITCH AA(CE) | 2 | 1.39% |
| Automobiles | 6 | 1.14% |
| IT - Software | 4 | 0.95% |
| Petroleum Products | 1 | 0.94% |
| ICRA A | 1 | 0.73% |
| ICRA A+ | 1 | 0.63% |
| Telecom - Services | 1 | 0.52% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 4 | 0.49% |
| Diversified FMCG | 2 | 0.48% |
| Construction | 1 | 0.43% |
| Finance | 2 | 0.41% |
| Power | 2 | 0.39% |
| Ferrous Metals | 2 | 0.34% |
| Consumer Durables | 2 | 0.34% |
| Cement & Cement Products | 2 | 0.27% |
| Food Products | 2 | 0.20% |
| Non - Ferrous Metals | 1 | 0.17% |
| Insurance | 2 | 0.15% |
| Oil | 1 | 0.13% |
| Consumable Fuels | 1 | 0.12% |
| FITCH AA | 1 | 0.11% |
| Healthcare Services | 1 | 0.09% |
| Agricultural Food & other Products | 1 | 0.08% |
| Agricultural, Commercial & Construction Vehicles | 1 | 0.08% |
| Leisure Services | 1 | 0.01% |
Active bets vs the average Hybrid fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | 3.51% | 7.32% | 8.98% | 9.87% | 14.72% | 100.0% |
| 3Y | 7.25% | 7.98% | 8.32% | 9.08% | 9.53% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 7.58% | 8.25% | 8.68% | 8.95% | 9.29% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 35.2% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Hybrid.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|