Loading mutual fund details…
SBI Conservative Hybrid Fund - Regular Plan - Growth is a hybrid scheme managed by SBI Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 10.20%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 9.67% and 10.79% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 9 of the last 12 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 1.50% on assets of ₹9,754Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mr. Saurabh Pant, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Value on the 3x3 equity style box, with 81% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.86% |
| KINGFA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (INDIA) LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.75% |
| BIOCON LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.40% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Energy | 1.35% |
| AXIS BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.31% |
| AETHER INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.24% |
| BAJAJ FINSERV LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.16% |
| AVANTI FEEDS LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.05% |
| HDFC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | Financial Services | 0.99% |
| HDFC BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 0.87% |
| GRAPHITE INDIA LIMITED | Industrials | 0.84% |
| GRINDWELL NORTON LIMITED | Industrials | 0.78% |
| HATSUN AGRO PRODUCT LTD | Consumer Defensive | 0.76% |
| MAX FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED | Financial Services | 0.65% |
| MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED. | Communication Services | 0.61% |
| VST INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 0.59% |
| GLAND PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 0.57% |
| G R INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED | Industrials | 0.53% |
| WONDERLA HOLIDAYS LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 0.52% |
| SHREE CEMENT LIMITED | Basic Materials | 0.50% |
| CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED | Industrials | 0.46% |
| VOLTAS LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 0.45% |
| GODREJ CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 0.44% |
| FINOLEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Industrials | 0.44% |
| JUBILANT FOODWORKS LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 0.41% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 8 | 5.35% |
| Capital Goods | — | 4.63% |
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 2.84% |
| Consumer Durables | — | 2.68% |
| Healthcare | 2 | 1.97% |
| Chemicals | — | 1.54% |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | — | 1.35% |
| Consumer Services | — | 1.18% |
| Construction | — | 1.02% |
| Construction Materials | — | 0.70% |
Active bets vs the average Hybrid fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | 3.21% | 6.21% | 9.85% | 13.86% | 22.96% | 100.0% |
| 3Y | 8.40% | 9.67% | 10.20% | 10.79% | 13.13% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 8.59% | 9.22% | 10.28% | 11.23% | 12.34% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 13.0% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Hybrid.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|