Loading mutual fund details…
HDFC Hybrid Debt Fund - Growth Plan is a hybrid scheme managed by HDFC Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 10.71%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 9.87% and 11.34% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 6 of the last 12 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 1.67% on assets of ₹3,261Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mr. Anupam Joshi, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
| Holding | Sector | Weight |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| 7.34% GOI MAT 220464 | Sovereign | 4.11% |
| Floating Rate GOI 2034 | Sovereign | 3.15% |
| 7.23% GOI MAT 150439 | Sovereign | 3.07% |
| 7.09% GOI MAT 050854 | Sovereign | 2.89% |
| 7.3% GOI MAT 190653 | Sovereign | 2.22% |
| 7.18% GOI MAT 240737 | Sovereign | 2.15% |
| 6.68% GOI MAT 170931 | Sovereign | 1.97% |
| 6.9% GOI MAT 150465 | Sovereign | 1.95% |
| ICICI Bank Ltd. | Financial Services | 1.94% |
| 6.48% GOI MAT 061035 | Sovereign | 1.92% |
| Altius Telecom Infrastructure Trust | CRISIL - AAA | 1.66% |
| National Highways Authority of India | CRISIL - AAA | 1.57% |
| Pipeline Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. | CRISIL - AAA | 1.54% |
| Export - Import Bank of India | CRISIL - AAA | 1.54% |
| Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd. | Financial Services | 1.54% |
| 6.68% GOI MAT 070740 | Sovereign | 1.46% |
| 7.24% GOI MAT 180855 | Sovereign | 1.32% |
| Axis Bank Ltd. | Financial Services | 1.27% |
| 7.09% GOI MAT 251174 | Sovereign | 1.13% |
| Reliance Industries Ltd. | Energy | 1.10% |
| 7.1% GOI MAT 080434 | Sovereign | 1.08% |
| Siddhivinayak Securitisation Trust (Originator - Sikka Ports & Terminals Limited) | CRISIL - AAA(SO) | 1.06% |
| 7.36% GOI MAT 120952 | Sovereign | 1.05% |
| 7.26% GOI MAT 060233 | Sovereign | 0.93% |
| National Bank for Agri & Rural Dev. | CRISIL - AAA | 0.91% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereign | 29 | 36.29% |
| CRISIL - AAA | 18 | 15.73% |
| Banks | 4 | 4.17% |
| IT - Software | 3 | 1.66% |
| ICRA - AA+ | 2 | 1.57% |
| Petroleum Products | 3 | 1.56% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 3 | 1.51% |
| CRISIL - AAA(SO) | 1 | 1.06% |
| Telecom - Services | 2 | 0.94% |
| Power | 2 | 0.90% |
| CARE - AA+ | 1 | 0.87% |
| Construction | 1 | 0.86% |
| CARE - AAA | 1 | 0.74% |
| Oil | 1 | 0.73% |
| Automobiles | 2 | 0.70% |
| Realty | 1 | 0.65% |
| Diversified FMCG | 1 | 0.48% |
| Insurance | 1 | 0.42% |
| Transport Services | 2 | 0.37% |
| Auto Components | 2 | 0.33% |
| Consumable Fuels | 1 | 0.30% |
| ICRA - AAA(SO) | 1 | 0.21% |
| Agricultural, Commercial & Construction Vehicles | 1 | 0.20% |
| Paper, Forest & Jute Products | 1 | 0.17% |
| Transport Infrastructure | 1 | 0.11% |
Active bets vs the average Hybrid fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -0.80% | 5.48% | 10.27% | 15.26% | 25.54% | 98.3% |
| 3Y | 7.48% | 9.87% | 10.71% | 11.34% | 13.56% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 7.69% | 9.18% | 10.39% | 11.33% | 12.87% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 25.4% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Hybrid.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 4 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|