Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex-US
The four numbers that price an ETF.
What the ETF actually owns.
From the most recent SEC N-PORT filing. The top-10 weight tells you how concentrated the fund is — broad-market trackers run 25-30%, single-theme funds often 50-70%.
| # | Holding | Weight | Value (USD) | Asset class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 3.24% | $19.61 B | EC |
| 2 | ASML Holding NV | 1.36% | $8.26 B | EC |
| 3 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | 1.25% | $7.57 B | EC |
| 4 | Tencent Holdings Ltd | 1.15% | $6.96 B | EC |
| 5 | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd | 0.92% | $5.57 B | EC |
| 6 | SK hynix Inc | 0.81% | $4.93 B | EC |
| 7 | HSBC Holdings PLC | 0.73% | $4.43 B | EC |
| 8 | Novartis AG | 0.69% | $4.16 B | EC |
| 9 | AstraZeneca PLC | 0.67% | $4.09 B | EC |
| 10 | Nestle SA | 0.58% | $3.53 B | EC |
| 11 | Toyota Motor Corp | 0.58% | $3.52 B | EC |
| 12 | Royal Bank of Canada | 0.57% | $3.45 B | EC |
| 13 | Shell PLC | 0.54% | $3.25 B | EC |
| 14 | Siemens AG | 0.54% | $3.25 B | EC |
| 15 | SAP SE | 0.50% | $3.00 B | EC |
| 16 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc | 0.48% | $2.91 B | EC |
| 17 | Banco Santander SA | 0.46% | $2.77 B | EC |
| 18 | Novo Nordisk A/S | 0.46% | $2.77 B | EC |
| 19 | Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 0.42% | $2.53 B | EC |
| 20 | Allianz SE | 0.41% | $2.49 B | EC |
| 21 | LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE | 0.40% | $2.41 B | EC |
| 22 | Toronto-Dominion Bank/The | 0.38% | $2.32 B | EC |
| 23 | Shopify Inc | 0.38% | $2.31 B | EC |
| 24 | Schneider Electric SE | 0.38% | $2.27 B | EC |
| 25 | Hitachi Ltd | 0.37% | $2.23 B | EC |
What we measure and what we leave out.
Data sources: SEC EDGAR N-PORT filings (holdings + filing-date timestamp); issuer fact sheets for expense ratio + AUM + inception; Yahoo Finance for daily NAV.
Expense ratio is the single biggest forward predictor of long-horizon performance. A 0.03% expense ratio compounds to a fundamentally different outcome than a 0.95% expense ratio over 25 years — even if the underlying index is identical.
Concentration risk lives in the top-10 weight. For broad-market trackers (VOO, VTI, SPY) the top-10 sits around 28-32%. For thematic funds — semiconductors, AI, cannabis — top-10 often crosses 60%. A "sector tilt" with 60% in 10 names is closer to active stock-picking than passive index exposure.
LRS + tax for Indian investors: US-listed ETFs are securities for Indian-tax purposes — held > 24 months = LTCG @ 12.5%, ≤ 24 months = slab-rate STCG. Distributions are dividends taxed at slab rates (US withholds 25%, creditable via DTAA). LRS USD 250,000 / FY cap applies to each remittance.
India-listed alternative: for S&P 500 / NASDAQ-100 exposure without LRS friction, see India-listed ETFs at /etfs/ (Motilal Oswal, Mirae, Nippon, etc. variants). Higher TER but no LRS hassle and INR-settled.
What this page does not model: tracking error vs underlying index, premium/discount to NAV, bid-ask spread on-exchange, currency-hedged variants (e.g. JPST-hedged), securities lending revenue (which subsidises some expense ratios).
ETF NAVs, tracking error and AUM are computed from AMFI disclosures. ETFs are subject to market risk and tracking-error risk. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.