iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Tracks FTSE China 50
The four numbers that price an ETF.
What the ETF actually owns.
From the most recent SEC N-PORT filing. The top-10 weight tells you how concentrated the fund is — broad-market trackers run 25-30%, single-theme funds often 50-70%.
| # | Holding | Weight | Value (USD) | Asset class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 9.50% | $630 M | EC |
| 2 | Tencent Holdings Limited | 8.58% | $569 M | EC |
| 3 | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION | 6.91% | $458 M | EC |
| 4 | XIAOMI CORPORATION | 6.11% | $405 M | EC |
| 5 | MEITUAN | 5.15% | $342 M | EC |
| 6 | INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 4.65% | $308 M | EC |
| 7 | Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. | 4.47% | $297 M | EC |
| 8 | BYD COMPANY LIMITED | 3.58% | $238 M | EC |
| 9 | NETEASE, INC. | 3.56% | $236 M | EC |
| 10 | BAIDU, INC. | 3.36% | $223 M | EC |
| 11 | BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 3.34% | $222 M | EC |
| 12 | TRIP.COM GROUP LIMITED | 2.97% | $197 M | EC |
| 13 | JD.COM, INC. | 2.95% | $195 M | EC |
| 14 | China Life Insurance Company Limited | 2.70% | $179 M | EC |
| 15 | Zijin Mining Group Company Limited | 2.54% | $169 M | EC |
| 16 | KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY | 2.32% | $154 M | EC |
| 17 | PetroChina Company Limited | 2.02% | $134 M | EC |
| 18 | China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. | 1.89% | $125 M | EC |
| 19 | AGRICULTURAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 1.75% | $116 M | EC |
| 20 | BeOne Medicines AG | 1.69% | $112 M | EC |
| 21 | Pop Mart International Group Ltd | 1.55% | $103 M | EC |
| 22 | China Shenhua Energy Company Limited | 1.52% | $101 M | EC |
| 23 | China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation | 1.29% | $86 M | EC |
| 24 | CHINA HONGQIAO GROUP LIMITED | 1.17% | $78 M | EC |
| 25 | PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited | 1.17% | $77 M | EC |
What we measure and what we leave out.
Data sources: SEC EDGAR N-PORT filings (holdings + filing-date timestamp); issuer fact sheets for expense ratio + AUM + inception; Yahoo Finance for daily NAV.
Expense ratio is the single biggest forward predictor of long-horizon performance. A 0.03% expense ratio compounds to a fundamentally different outcome than a 0.95% expense ratio over 25 years — even if the underlying index is identical.
Concentration risk lives in the top-10 weight. For broad-market trackers (VOO, VTI, SPY) the top-10 sits around 28-32%. For thematic funds — semiconductors, AI, cannabis — top-10 often crosses 60%. A "sector tilt" with 60% in 10 names is closer to active stock-picking than passive index exposure.
LRS + tax for Indian investors: US-listed ETFs are securities for Indian-tax purposes — held > 24 months = LTCG @ 12.5%, ≤ 24 months = slab-rate STCG. Distributions are dividends taxed at slab rates (US withholds 25%, creditable via DTAA). LRS USD 250,000 / FY cap applies to each remittance.
India-listed alternative: for S&P 500 / NASDAQ-100 exposure without LRS friction, see India-listed ETFs at /etfs/ (Motilal Oswal, Mirae, Nippon, etc. variants). Higher TER but no LRS hassle and INR-settled.
What this page does not model: tracking error vs underlying index, premium/discount to NAV, bid-ask spread on-exchange, currency-hedged variants (e.g. JPST-hedged), securities lending revenue (which subsidises some expense ratios).
ETF NAVs, tracking error and AUM are computed from AMFI disclosures. ETFs are subject to market risk and tracking-error risk. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.