Loading mutual fund details…
WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund Regular Plan Growth is an equity scheme managed by WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 0 of the last 1 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 2.43% on assets of ₹604Cr. The fund is currently managed by Ms. Trupti Agarwal, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Blend on the 3x3 equity style box, with 88% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| ICICI BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 7.78% |
| BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED | Communication Services | 5.71% |
| MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 3.72% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 3.40% |
| JB Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Limited | Healthcare | 3.28% |
| MARICO LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 2.79% |
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 2.75% |
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Basic Materials | 2.12% |
| GODREJ CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 2.01% |
| MUTHOOT FINANCE LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.88% |
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.87% |
| GLOBAL HEALTH LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.69% |
| AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.61% |
| Krishna Institute Of Medical Sciences Limited | Healthcare | 1.48% |
| THE PHOENIX MILLS LIMITED | Real Estate | 1.47% |
| GILLETTE INDIA LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.46% |
| DOMS INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.45% |
| JYOTHY LABS LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.44% |
| EUREKA FORBES LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.43% |
| ABBOTT INDIA LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.26% |
| MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.25% |
| India Shelter Finance Corporation Limited | Financial Services | 1.22% |
| POLY MEDICURE LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.19% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.18% |
| CARE RATINGS LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.17% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 19.61% |
| Financial Services | 8 | 17.43% |
| Healthcare | 9 | 13.07% |
| Automobile and Auto Components | — | 7.63% |
| Consumer Durables | — | 6.93% |
| Consumer Services | — | 5.71% |
| Telecommunication | — | 5.71% |
| Chemicals | — | 2.99% |
| Information Technology | — | 2.54% |
| Realty | — | 1.47% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -9.07% | -6.10% | -3.84% | 0.36% | 5.59% | 30.8% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 35.4% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 5 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|
| SBI COMMA Fund - REGULAR PLAN - Growth | SBI Mutual Fund | ₹1,081 Cr | 2.21% | +20.98% | +12.53% | 4★ |
| Edelweiss Recently Listed IPO Fund Regular Plan Growth | Edelweiss Mutual Fund | ₹984 Cr | 2.25% | +17.79% | +12.69% | 4★ |
| Sundaram Services Fund Regular Plan - Growth | Sundaram Mutual Fund | ₹4,624 Cr | 1.85% | +14.19% | +14.23% | 3★ |
| Taurus Ethical Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | Taurus Mutual Fund | ₹395 Cr | 2.77% | +13.30% | +10.29% | 3★ |
| SBI Equity Minimum Variance Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | SBI Mutual Fund | ₹211 Cr | 0.75% | +10.03% | +10.36% | 3★ |
| Tata Housing Opportunities Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | Tata Mutual Fund | ₹476 Cr | 2.48% | +8.87% | — | 3★ |
| Tata Ethical Fund-Regular Plan - Growth Option | Tata Mutual Fund | ₹3,704 Cr | 1.94% | +6.53% | +8.61% | 2★ |
| Bandhan Multi-Factor Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | Bandhan Mutual Fund | ₹673 Cr | 2.36% | — | — | — |
| Kotak Rural Opportunities Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund | ₹828 Cr | 2.33% | — | — | — |
| SBI Quality Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | SBI Mutual Fund | ₹2,306 Cr | 2.01% | — | — | — |