Loading mutual fund details…
Motilal Oswal Nifty MidSmall Healthcare Index Fund- Direct Plan-Growth is an index scheme managed by Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund. The total expense ratio is 0.65% on assets of ₹31Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mr. Rakesh Shetty, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Blend on the 3x3 equity style box, with 80% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
ETF-specific data. Tracking error is the standard-deviation of (ETF return − index return) over the trailing year.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| LUPIN LIMITED | Healthcare | 9.88% |
| FORTIS HEALTHCARE LIMITED. | Healthcare | 8.50% |
| LAURUS LABS LIMITED | Healthcare | 7.57% |
| AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 6.87% |
| GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED | Healthcare | 6.40% |
| ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED | Healthcare | 5.58% |
| BIOCON LIMITED | Healthcare | 4.54% |
| MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 4.49% |
| IPCA LABORATORIES LIMITED | Healthcare | 3.76% |
| ASTER DM HEALTHCARE LIMITED | Healthcare | 3.14% |
| JB Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Limited | Healthcare | 2.95% |
| Krishna Institute Of Medical Sciences Limited | Healthcare | 2.91% |
| Sai Life Sciences Limited | Healthcare | 2.60% |
| GLAND PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.46% |
| ABBOTT INDIA LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.32% |
| NEULAND LABORATORIES LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.28% |
| NARAYANA HRUDAYALAYA LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.16% |
| AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.10% |
| WOCKHARDT LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.04% |
| GRANULES INDIA LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.79% |
| PIRAMAL PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.77% |
| NATCO PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.74% |
| GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD | Healthcare | 1.71% |
| GLOBAL HEALTH LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.67% |
| SYNGENE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.57% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | 27 | 100.04% |
Active bets vs the average Index fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -2.12% | 1.73% | 6.95% | 13.34% | 18.45% | 86.8% |
Top-10 weight 60.7% means concentration is in line with most actively-managed Indian equity funds. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Index.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
What an investor SIPping into this fund actually got during named market shocks.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 3 data points.