Loading mutual fund details…
UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund - Regular Plan - Growth Option is an index scheme managed by UTI Mutual Fund. Three-year compounded annual return is 30.74%, placing it in the 99th percentile of Index peers. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 2 of the last 2 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 1.08% on assets of ₹722Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mr. Ayush Jain, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Value on the 3x3 equity style box, with 90% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED | Energy | 5.90% |
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | Basic Materials | 5.77% |
| NTPC LIMITED | Utilities | 5.69% |
| POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED | Utilities | 5.54% |
| COAL INDIA LTD | Energy | 5.53% |
| HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Basic Materials | 5.49% |
| STATE BANK OF INDIA | Financial Services | 5.11% |
| GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Basic Materials | 4.58% |
| TATA MOTORS PASSENGER VEHICLES LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 4.40% |
| POWER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. | Financial Services | 3.29% |
| INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED | Energy | 3.17% |
| BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. | Energy | 3.17% |
| HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED | Energy | 2.17% |
| VEDANTA LIMITED | Basic Materials | 2.09% |
| NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.91% |
| REC LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.84% |
| ASTER DM HEALTHCARE LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.83% |
| GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED | Utilities | 1.81% |
| BANK OF BARODA | Financial Services | 1.80% |
| INDUSIND BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.75% |
| STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.74% |
| NMDC LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.70% |
| Canara Bank | Financial Services | 1.54% |
| THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.37% |
| UPL LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.33% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 17 | 24.56% |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | — | 23.73% |
| Metals & Mining | — | 18.70% |
| Power | — | 12.55% |
| Construction Materials | — | 4.58% |
| Automobile and Auto Components | — | 4.40% |
| Chemicals | — | 2.29% |
| Services | — | 2.26% |
| Healthcare | 1 | 1.83% |
| Construction | — | 1.00% |
Active bets vs the average Index fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 51.3% means concentration is in line with most actively-managed Indian equity funds. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Index.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.