Loading mutual fund details…
HDFC Nifty SDL Oct 2026 Index Fund - Growth Option is an index scheme managed by HDFC Mutual Fund. Three-year compounded annual return is 6.93%, placing it in the 21st percentile of Index peers. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 0 of the last 2 reported years. The total expense ratio is 0.35% on assets of ₹183Cr. The fund is currently managed by Sankalp Baid, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
| Holding | Sector | Weight |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| 7.37% Maharashtra SDL - Mat 140926 | Sovereign | 22.82% |
| 8.72% Tamil Nadu SDL Mat 190926 | Sovereign | 10.02% |
| 7.58% Maharashtra SDL MAT 240826 | Sovereign | 9.34% |
| 6.24% Maharashtra SDL MAT 110826 | Sovereign | 9.31% |
| 8.08% Maharashtra SDL - Mat 150626 | Sovereign | 6.58% |
| 7.37% Tamil Nadu SDL Mat 140926 | Sovereign | 5.50% |
| 7.83% Gujarat SDL - Mat 130726 | Sovereign | 5.49% |
| 5.7% Karnataka SDL - Mat 150726 | Sovereign | 5.47% |
| 7.14% Karnataka SDL - Mat 131026 | Sovereign | 3.41% |
| 7.84% Tamil Nadu SDL - Mat 130726 | Sovereign | 2.75% |
| 7.16% UP SDL Mat 131026 | Sovereign | 2.75% |
| 6.27% Rajasthan SDL Mat 200726 | Sovereign | 2.60% |
| 7.16% Maharashtra SDL - Mat 280926 | Sovereign | 2.53% |
| 7.61% Kerala SDL Mat - 090826 | Sovereign | 1.48% |
| 7.58% Tamilnadu SDL MAT 240826 | Sovereign | 1.10% |
| 7.63% Uttar Pradesh SDL - Mat 090826 | Sovereign | 0.82% |
| 7.98% Kerala SDL - Mat 110526 | Sovereign | 0.82% |
| 8.07% Kerala SDL Mat 150626 | Sovereign | 0.82% |
| 7.18% Haryana SDL Mat 280926 | Sovereign | 0.55% |
| 7.63% Andhra Pradesh SDL Mat 090826 | Sovereign | 0.55% |
| 7.98% Gujarat SDL - Mat 110526 | Sovereign | 0.55% |
| 7.39% Uttarakhand SDL Mat 140926 | Sovereign | 0.32% |
| 7.98% Goa SDL Mat 290626 | Sovereign | 0.32% |
| 7.84% Maharashtra SDL MAT 130726 | Sovereign | 0.27% |
| 7.85% Telangana SDL Mat 130726 | Sovereign | 0.27% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereign | 30 | 97.24% |
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 80.7% means the manager bets the fund's outcome on a small basket. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Index.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 3 data points.