Loading mutual fund details…
HDFC NIFTY Midcap 150 ETF - Growth Option is an etf scheme managed by HDFC Mutual Fund. Three-year compounded annual return is 21.01%, placing it in the 75th percentile of ETF peers. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 1 of the last 2 reported years. The total expense ratio is 0.20% on assets of ₹138Cr. The fund is currently managed by Arun Agarwal, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
| Holding | Sector | Weight |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
ETF-specific data. Tracking error is the standard-deviation of (ETF return − index return) over the trailing year.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE) | Financial Services | 3.79% |
| Multi Commodity Exchange of India L | Financial Services | 1.93% |
| The Federal Bank Ltd. | Financial Services | 1.80% |
| Suzlon Energy Ltd | Industrials | 1.72% |
| Hero MotoCorp Ltd. | Consumer Cyclical | 1.69% |
| Indusind Bank Ltd. | Financial Services | 1.54% |
| Au Small Finance Bank Ltd. | Financial Services | 1.47% |
| PB Fintech Limited | Financial Services | 1.45% |
| Lupin Ltd. | Healthcare | 1.43% |
| GE T&D INDIA LIMITED | Industrials | 1.41% |
| Indus Towers Limited | Communication Services | 1.35% |
| Persistent Systems Limited | Technology | 1.33% |
| Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. | Industrials | 1.31% |
| Bharat Forge Ltd. | Consumer Cyclical | 1.28% |
| Fortis Healthcare Limited | Healthcare | 1.23% |
| IDFC First Bank Limited | Financial Services | 1.18% |
| Ashok Leyland Ltd | Industrials | 1.18% |
| Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd. | Technology | 1.18% |
| One 97 Communications Limited | Technology | 1.18% |
| Hitachi Energy India Ltd. | Industrials | 1.09% |
| Laurus Labs Ltd. | Healthcare | 1.09% |
| Polycab India Limited | Industrials | 1.09% |
| ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co | Financial Services | 1.09% |
| Max Financial Services Ltd. | Financial Services | 1.07% |
| Marico Ltd. | Consumer Defensive | 1.05% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 8 | 8.49% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 12 | 8.09% |
| Capital Markets | 7 | 7.81% |
| Electrical Equipment | 8 | 7.52% |
| Finance | 13 | 5.51% |
| Auto Components | 9 | 5.10% |
| IT - Software | 7 | 4.56% |
| Consumer Durables | 7 | 4.50% |
| Industrial Products | 6 | 4.19% |
| Retailing | 5 | 3.87% |
| Insurance | 6 | 3.54% |
| Power | 6 | 2.94% |
| Telecom - Services | 4 | 2.83% |
| Realty | 4 | 2.65% |
| Financial Technology (Fintech) | 2 | 2.63% |
| Fertilizers & Agrochemicals | 3 | 2.15% |
| Agricultural Food & Other Products | 3 | 1.74% |
| Chemicals & Petrochemicals | 3 | 1.71% |
| Automobiles | 1 | 1.69% |
| Healthcare Services | 2 | 1.47% |
| Agricultural, Commercial & Construction Vehicles | 2 | 1.45% |
| Minerals & Mining | 2 | 1.37% |
| Personal Products | 2 | 1.36% |
| Leisure Services | 3 | 1.36% |
| Ferrous Metals | 2 | 1.31% |
| Cement & Cement Products | 3 | 1.17% |
| Transport Infrastructure | 2 | 1.11% |
| Gas | 2 | 0.98% |
| Beverages | 2 | 0.95% |
| Petroleum Products | 1 | 0.92% |
| Non - Ferrous Metals | 1 | 0.91% |
| Textiles & Apparels | 2 | 0.86% |
| Oil | 1 | 0.68% |
| Industrial Manufacturing | 2 | 0.54% |
| Transport Services | 1 | 0.45% |
| Construction | 1 | 0.43% |
| Diversified | 2 | 0.35% |
| Aerospace & Defense | 1 | 0.32% |
| IT - Services | 1 | 0.25% |
| Cigarettes & Tobacco Products | 1 | 0.23% |
Active bets vs the average ETF fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 18.2% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: ETF.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 5 data points.