HSBC Value Fund - Regular Growth is an equity scheme managed by HSBC Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 21.99%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 20.90% and 22.99% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 9 of the last 12 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 1.71% on assets of ₹14,873Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mayank Chaturvedi, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Value on the 3x3 equity style box, with 92% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-04-30.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| Shriram Finance Limited | Financial Services | 2.83% |
| Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd | Financial Services | 2.14% |
| Indian Bank | Financial Services | 1.96% |
| Angel One Limited | Financial Services | 1.58% |
| Varun Beverages Ltd | Consumer Defensive | 1.24% |
| Jindal Saw Limited | Basic Materials | 1.19% |
| Canara Bank | Financial Services | 0.95% |
| Pearl Global Industries Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 0.89% |
| Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited | Real Estate | 0.79% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited | Financial Services | 0.73% |
| Sapphire Foods India Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 0.47% |
| Epigral Limited | Basic Materials | 0.40% |
| Bharat Bijlee Limited | Industrials | 0.25% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 3 | 22.54% |
| Finance | 1 | 8.72% |
| IT - Software | 5 | 5.59% |
| Industrial Products | 1 | 4.73% |
| Construction | 5 | 4.38% |
| Petroleum Products | 2 | 4.28% |
| Capital Markets | 2 | 4.12% |
| Textiles & Apparels | 1 | 3.99% |
| Non - Ferrous Metals | 2 | 3.52% |
| Ferrous Metals | 3 | 3.49% |
| Power | 1 | 3.46% |
| Electrical Equipment | 1 | 3.12% |
| Automobiles | 3 | 2.88% |
| Fertilizers & Agrochemicals | 3 | 2.57% |
| Realty | 3 | 2.33% |
| Cement & Cement Products | 3 | 2.32% |
| Beverages | 1 | 2.20% |
| Agricultural Food & other Products | 2 | 2.19% |
| Telecom - Services | 1 | 1.57% |
| Oil | 1 | 1.39% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 2 | 1.32% |
| Consumer Durables | 3 | 1.28% |
| Diversified FMCG | 1 | 1.23% |
| Paper, Forest & Jute Products | 1 | 1.20% |
| Leisure Services | 1 | 1.08% |
| Retailing | 1 | 0.94% |
| Cigarettes & Tobacco Products | 1 | 0.92% |
| Chemicals & Petrochemicals | 1 | 0.40% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -5.04% | 4.83% | 14.54% | 47.62% | 63.05% | 92.5% |
| 3Y | 18.92% | 20.90% | 21.99% | 22.99% | 24.74% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 14.3% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|
| Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Regular Plan | Quant Mutual Fund | ₹1,762 Cr | 2.78% | +24.25% | — | 5★ |
| DSP Value Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | DSP Mutual Fund | ₹1,484 Cr | 1.85% | +18.79% | +14.30% | 5★ |
| Axis Value Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | Axis Mutual Fund | ₹1,533 Cr | 2.55% | +18.47% | — | 5★ |
| Union Value Fund - Regular Plan - Growth Option | Union Mutual Fund | ₹373 Cr | 3.00% | +14.90% | +13.70% | 3★ |
| ITI Value Fund - Regular Plan - Growth Option | ITI Mutual Fund | ₹353 Cr | 2.41% | +14.85% | — | 3★ |
| Tata Value Fund - Regular Plan -Growth Option | Tata Mutual Fund | ₹8,592 Cr | 2.07% | +14.63% | +14.17% | 3★ |
| UTI Value Fund - Regular Plan - Growth Option | UTI Mutual Fund | ₹9,433 Cr | 2.14% | +14.30% | +12.44% | 3★ |
| Groww Value Fund (formerly known as Indiabulls Value Fund) - Regular Plan - Growth Option | Groww Mutual Fund | ₹67 Cr | 2.77% | +14.14% | +11.86% | 3★ |
| Bandhan Value Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | Bandhan Mutual Fund | ₹9,908 Cr | 2.63% | +12.34% | +14.32% | 2★ |
| Quantum Value Fund - Regular Plan Growth Option | Quantum Mutual Fund | ₹1,114 Cr | 2.11% | +12.31% | +10.43% | 2★ |