Loading mutual fund details…
Kotak Nifty SDL Apr 2027 Top 12 Equal Weight Index Fund-Regular Plan- Growth is an index scheme managed by Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund. Three-year compounded annual return is 7.11%, placing it in the 38th percentile of Index peers. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 1 of the last 3 reported years. The total expense ratio is 0.35% on assets of ₹6,742Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mr. Abhishek Bisen, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
| Holding | Sector | Weight |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| 7.62% State Government Securities | Others | 4.88% |
| 7.71% State Government Securities | Others | 4.38% |
| 6.58% State Government Securities | Others | 3.98% |
| 7.64% State Government Securities | Others | 3.72% |
| Tamil Nadu State Govt - 2027 - Tamil Nadu | Others | 2.85% |
| 8.31% State Government Securities | Others | 2.49% |
| Haryana State Govt - 2027 - Haryana | Others | 2.03% |
| 7.87% State Government Securities | Others | 1.94% |
| State Government of Rajasthan | Others | 1.58% |
| 7.85% State Government Securities | Others | 1.28% |
| 7.6% State Government Securities | Others | 1.25% |
| 6.72% State Government Securities | Others | 1.12% |
| 7.74% State Government Securities | Others | 1.05% |
| State Government of Bihar | Others | 0.96% |
| 7.8% State Government Securities | Others | 0.84% |
| West Bengal State Govt - 2027 - West Bengal | Others | 0.75% |
| Uttar Pradesh State Govt - 2027 - Uttar Pradesh | Others | 0.68% |
| 7.59% State Government Securities | Others | 0.38% |
| Bihar State Govt - 2027 - Bihar | Others | 0.15% |
| 7.77% State Government Securities | Others | 0.15% |
| Kerala State Govt - 2027 - Kerala | Others | 0.11% |
| Rajasthan State Govt - 2027 - Rajasthan | Others | 0.11% |
| 7.2% State Government Securities | Others | 0.07% |
| West Bengal State Govt - 2026 - West Bengal | Others | 0.03% |
| State Government of Karnataka | Others | 0.03% |
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 29.1% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Index.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.