Loading mutual fund details…
Edelweiss NIFTY Large Midcap 250 Index Fund - Regular Plan Growth is an index scheme managed by Edelweiss Mutual Fund. Three-year compounded annual return is 14.99%, placing it in the 73rd percentile of Index peers. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 3 of the last 4 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 0.89% on assets of ₹316Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mr. Bhavesh Jain, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Value on the 3x3 equity style box, with 91% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| HDFC BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 4.29% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Energy | 3.51% |
| ICICI BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 3.28% |
| BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED | Communication Services | 2.11% |
| BSE LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.93% |
| LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED | Industrials | 1.71% |
| STATE BANK OF INDIA | Financial Services | 1.61% |
| INFOSYS LIMITED | Technology | 1.51% |
| AXIS BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.32% |
| ITC LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.10% |
| MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.01% |
| THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 0.92% |
| TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED | Technology | 0.92% |
| SUZLON ENERGY LIMITED | Industrials | 0.88% |
| HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 0.86% |
| INDUSIND BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 0.78% |
| AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 0.75% |
| PB FINTECH LIMITED | Financial Services | 0.74% |
| LUPIN LIMITED | Healthcare | 0.73% |
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 0.73% |
| SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. | Healthcare | 0.70% |
| INDUS TOWERS LIMITED | Communication Services | 0.69% |
| NTPC LIMITED | Utilities | 0.69% |
| Persistent Systems Ltd | Technology | 0.68% |
| BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED | Industrials | 0.67% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 47 | 30.26% |
| Capital Goods | — | 9.24% |
| Healthcare | 21 | 7.24% |
| Automobile and Auto Components | — | 6.83% |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | — | 6.29% |
| Information Technology | — | 6.03% |
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 5.48% |
| Metals & Mining | — | 4.27% |
| Consumer Services | — | 4.08% |
| Power | — | 3.69% |
Active bets vs the average Index fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 22.4% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Index.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.