Loading mutual fund details…
Tata Business Cycle Fund-Direct Plan-Growth is an equity scheme managed by Tata Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 20.57%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 18.77% and 24.50% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 1 of the last 1 reported years. The total expense ratio is 0.77% on assets of ₹2,637Cr. The fund is currently managed by Sailesh Jain, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Blend on the 3x3 equity style box, with 88% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Energy | 5.29% |
| HDFC BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 4.25% |
| METROPOLIS HEALTHCARE LIMITED | Healthcare | 3.77% |
| AXIS BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 3.74% |
| LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED | Industrials | 3.08% |
| DELHIVERY LIMITED | Industrials | 2.90% |
| CUMMINS INDIA LIMITED | Industrials | 2.66% |
| AMBUJA CEMENTS LIMITED | Basic Materials | 2.63% |
| LUPIN LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.38% |
| PB FINTECH LIMITED | Financial Services | 2.36% |
| APOLLO HOSPITALS ENTERPRISE LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.31% |
| GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED | Real Estate | 2.16% |
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | Basic Materials | 2.13% |
| Shriram Finance Limited | Financial Services | 2.05% |
| NIVA BUPA HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | Financial Services | 2.02% |
| Varun Beverages Ltd | Consumer Defensive | 1.91% |
| MARICO LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.88% |
| THE RAMCO CEMENTS LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.81% |
| BANK OF BARODA | Financial Services | 1.77% |
| ADANI PORTS AND SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE LIMITED | Industrials | 1.56% |
| HDFC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.43% |
| Acme Solar Holdings Ltd | Utilities | 1.43% |
| BAJAJ FINSERV LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.39% |
| KEC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | Industrials | 1.37% |
| NUVOCO VISTAS CORPORATION LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.25% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 12 | 30.60% |
| Healthcare | 3 | 9.83% |
| Metals & Mining | — | 7.86% |
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 6.93% |
| Construction Materials | — | 6.65% |
| Power | — | 6.04% |
| Capital Goods | — | 5.75% |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | — | 5.29% |
| Services | — | 4.46% |
| Construction | — | 4.45% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -10.21% | 4.07% | 12.64% | 33.02% | 57.65% | 87.7% |
| 3Y | 15.26% | 18.77% | 20.57% | 24.50% | 28.26% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 33.1% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
What an investor SIPping into this fund actually got during named market shocks.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 4 data points.