Loading mutual fund details…
Nippon India Multi - Asset Omni FoF - DIRECT Plan - IDCW Option is a fof scheme managed by Nippon India Mutual Fund. Three-year compounded annual return is 19.36%, placing it in the 46th percentile of FoF peers. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 3 of the last 3 reported years. The total expense ratio is 0.09% on assets of ₹2,520Cr. The fund is currently managed by Sushil Budhia, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
| Holding | Sector | Weight |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Nippon India Large Cap Fund-Direct Growth Plan | Others | 20.99% |
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fd-Dir Pl-Gr Pl-GrOpt | Others | 20.87% |
| Nippon India Nifty Smallcap 250 Ind FundDi Pl-GrOp | Others | 16.99% |
| Nippon India ETF Gold Bees | Others | 16.95% |
| Nippon India Short Duration Fd-Dir Pl Gr Pl-Gr Opt | Others | 9.35% |
| Nippon India Gilt Sec Fund Dir Pl Growth Pl Gr Op | Others | 8.61% |
| Nippon India Silver ETF | Others | 3.34% |
| Nippon India Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan Gr Pl | Others | 0.87% |
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 5Y | 16.52% | 17.53% | 18.03% | 18.63% | 19.49% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 98.0% means the manager bets the fund's outcome on a small basket. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: FoF.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 3 data points.