BANDHAN SMALL CAP FUND - DIRECT PLAN GROWTH is an equity scheme managed by Bandhan Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 31.46%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 29.49% and 32.96% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 2 of the last 2 reported years. The total expense ratio is 0.80% on assets of ₹25,346Cr. The fund is currently managed by Kirthi Jain, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Value on the 3x3 equity style box, with 71% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| REC LIMITED | Financial Services | 3.49% |
| SOBHA LIMITED | Real Estate | 3.28% |
| LT FOODS LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 2.14% |
| PNB HOUSING FINANCE LTD | Financial Services | 1.66% |
| THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. | Financial Services | 1.66% |
| ARVIND LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.55% |
| THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED | Industrials | 1.32% |
| THE KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.29% |
| CHOLAMANDALAM FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.27% |
| YATHARTH HOSPITAL & TRAUMA CARE SERVICES LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.27% |
| JUBILANT PHARMOVA LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.20% |
| Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 1.13% |
| CYIENT LIMITED | Industrials | 1.05% |
| PARADEEP PHOSPHATES LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.05% |
| APAR INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Industrials | 1.02% |
| DCB BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 0.97% |
| GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED | Healthcare | 0.88% |
| RASHI PERIPHERALS PRIVATE LIMITED | Technology | 0.86% |
| ADITYA BIRLA REAL ESTATE LIMITED | Real Estate | 0.84% |
| REPCO HOME FINANCE LTD. | Financial Services | 0.84% |
| GODREJ INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Industrials | 0.83% |
| Senco Gold Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 0.79% |
| GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA | Financial Services | 0.78% |
| TARC LIMITED | Real Estate | 0.77% |
| SUNDARAM CLAYTON LIMITED | Industrials | 0.76% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 29 | 23.33% |
| Healthcare | 28 | 9.61% |
| Capital Goods | — | 9.14% |
| Realty | — | 6.96% |
| Chemicals | — | 4.78% |
| Consumer Durables | — | 4.28% |
| Consumer Services | — | 3.99% |
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 3.99% |
| Services | — | 3.66% |
| Information Technology | — | 3.28% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -9.90% | 4.13% | 24.51% | 65.65% | 114.93% | 82.4% |
| 3Y | 22.38% | 29.49% | 31.46% | 32.96% | 38.41% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 21.46% | 24.96% | 29.63% | 33.36% | 39.33% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 18.9% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
What an investor SIPping into this fund actually got during named market shocks.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 4 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|
| ITI Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | ITI Mutual Fund | ₹2,937 Cr | 1.02% | +25.60% | +17.72% | 5★ |
| Invesco India Smallcap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Invesco Mutual Fund | ₹11,038 Cr | 0.66% | +23.49% | +21.18% | 5★ |
| ITI Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan - IDCW Option | ITI Mutual Fund | ₹2,937 Cr | 1.02% | +23.38% | +16.47% | 5★ |
| Mahindra Manulife Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Mahindra Manulife Mutual Fund | ₹4,462 Cr | 1.60% | +23.35% | — | 5★ |
| BANK OF INDIA Small Cap Fund Direct Plan Growth | Bank of India Mutual Fund | ₹2,168 Cr | 1.18% | +23.07% | +21.06% | 5★ |
| Union Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan - IDCW Option | Union Mutual Fund | ₹1,980 Cr | 1.13% | +20.19% | +18.62% | 4★ |
| Union Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Union Mutual Fund | ₹1,980 Cr | 1.13% | +20.18% | +18.61% | 4★ |
| Sundaram Small Cap Fund Direct Plan - Growth | Sundaram Mutual Fund | ₹3,563 Cr | 0.85% | +19.58% | +18.74% | 4★ |
| Edelweiss Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Edelweiss Mutual Fund | ₹5,952 Cr | 0.82% | +18.40% | +18.91% | 4★ |
| UTI Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | UTI Mutual Fund | ₹4,872 Cr | 0.68% | +16.79% | +17.22% | 3★ |