Loading mutual fund details…
Tata Small Cap Fund-Direct Plan-Growth is an equity scheme managed by Tata Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 27.93%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 21.61% and 34.33% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 0 of the last 2 reported years. The total expense ratio is 0.53% on assets of ₹11,330Cr. The fund is currently managed by Jeetendra Khatri, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Mid-Blend on the 3x3 equity style box, with 73% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC COMPANY LTD. | Industrials | 5.57% |
| USHA MARTIN LIMITED | Basic Materials | 4.63% |
| SUDARSHAN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. | Basic Materials | 4.03% |
| TEGA INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Industrials | 3.74% |
| IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 3.67% |
| GODREJ INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Industrials | 3.34% |
| WOCKHARDT LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.59% |
| CELLO WORLD PRIVATE LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 2.56% |
| BASF INDIA LIMITED | Basic Materials | 2.45% |
| TIME TECHNOPLAST LIMITED | Industrials | 2.42% |
| GRAPHITE INDIA LIMITED | Industrials | 2.35% |
| C.E. INFO SYSTEMS LIMITED | Technology | 2.27% |
| KSB Limited | Industrials | 2.01% |
| CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED | Industrials | 2.01% |
| WONDERLA HOLIDAYS LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 2.00% |
| SUNDARAM - CLAYTON LIMITED | Industrials | 1.93% |
| DCB BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.87% |
| ELANTAS BECK INDIA LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.78% |
| ANANT RAJ LIMITED | Real Estate | 1.76% |
| GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.65% |
| SAMHI HOTELS LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.64% |
| NETWORK PEOPLE SERVICES TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED | Technology | 1.61% |
| QUESS CORP LIMITED | Industrials | 1.61% |
| KIRLOSKAR FERROUS INDUSTRIES LTD | Others | 1.61% |
| Acme Solar Holdings Ltd | Utilities | 1.58% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Goods | — | 13.64% |
| Chemicals | — | 4.75% |
| Consumer Durables | — | 3.34% |
| Consumer Services | — | 3.27% |
| Services | — | 3.26% |
| Healthcare | 3 | 2.89% |
| Financial Services | 2 | 2.77% |
| Information Technology | — | 2.15% |
| Automobile and Auto Components | — | 1.75% |
| Diversified | — | 1.67% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -15.79% | 6.38% | 28.16% | 45.56% | 112.26% | 84.2% |
| 3Y | 10.45% | 21.61% | 27.93% | 34.33% | 46.10% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 15.68% | 19.99% | 26.70% | 32.32% | 37.38% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 35.0% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
What an investor SIPping into this fund actually got during named market shocks.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.