PGIM India Midcap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option is an equity scheme managed by PGIM India Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 17.63%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 14.55% and 22.32% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 0 of the last 2 reported years. The total expense ratio is 0.79% on assets of ₹10,738Cr. The fund is currently managed by Utsav Mehta, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Growth on the 3x3 equity style box, with 85% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| UNO MINDA LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 2.52% |
| J.K.CEMENT LIMITED | Basic Materials | 2.48% |
| Bharti Hexacom Limited | Communication Services | 2.41% |
| THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 2.40% |
| VISHAL MEGA MART PRIVATE LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 2.23% |
| MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.17% |
| AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 2.08% |
| ADITYA BIRLA CAPITAL LIMITED | Financial Services | 2.06% |
| MAX FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.98% |
| PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Real Estate | 1.95% |
| DIXON TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LIMITED | Technology | 1.91% |
| FSN E-COMMERCE VENTURES LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.71% |
| SOLAR INDUSTRIES INDIA LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.66% |
| BLUE STAR LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.60% |
| MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.50% |
| BSE LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.45% |
| SRF LIMITED | Industrials | 1.45% |
| TVS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.45% |
| COROMANDEL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.42% |
| CG POWER AND INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED | Industrials | 1.36% |
| TORRENT POWER LIMITED | Utilities | 1.36% |
| TUBE INVESTMENTS OF INDIA LIMITED | Industrials | 1.33% |
| CUMMINS INDIA LIMITED | Industrials | 1.31% |
| ABBOTT INDIA LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.25% |
| PB FINTECH LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.22% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 17 | 25.43% |
| Capital Goods | — | 13.96% |
| Healthcare | 11 | 11.11% |
| Automobile and Auto Components | — | 8.11% |
| Consumer Services | — | 7.56% |
| Chemicals | — | 5.34% |
| Consumer Durables | — | 4.42% |
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 3.21% |
| Information Technology | — | 3.15% |
| Realty | — | 3.14% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -4.77% | 6.03% | 13.44% | 32.77% | 113.68% | 95.1% |
| 3Y | 9.53% | 14.55% | 17.63% | 22.32% | 40.56% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 13.68% | 16.51% | 22.20% | 27.00% | 32.11% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 22.3% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
What an investor SIPping into this fund actually got during named market shocks.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 4 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|
| WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund Direct Plan Growth | WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund | ₹5,293 Cr | 0.72% | +25.45% | — | 5★ |
| Invesco India Midcap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Invesco Mutual Fund | ₹11,767 Cr | 1.04% | +25.12% | +21.10% | 5★ |
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - IDCW Option | Edelweiss Mutual Fund | ₹15,911 Cr | 0.60% | +24.48% | +19.98% | 5★ |
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Edelweiss Mutual Fund | ₹15,911 Cr | 0.60% | +24.48% | +21.16% | 5★ |
| ITI Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | ITI Mutual Fund | ₹1,358 Cr | 0.57% | +24.19% | +17.90% | 4★ |
| Mahindra Manulife Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan -Growth | Mahindra Manulife Mutual Fund | ₹4,688 Cr | 0.91% | +24.11% | +20.48% | 5★ |
| Sundaram Mid Cap Fund Direct Plan - Growth | Sundaram Mutual Fund | ₹13,378 Cr | 1.43% | +23.08% | +19.60% | 4★ |
| BARODA BNP PARIBAS Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund | ₹2,389 Cr | 0.57% | +21.51% | — | 4★ |
| Kotak Midcap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund | ₹63,539 Cr | 0.46% | +20.80% | +18.66% | 3★ |
| ITI Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - IDCW Option | ITI Mutual Fund | ₹1,358 Cr | 0.57% | +20.65% | +15.87% | 3★ |