Loading mutual fund details…
quant Small Cap Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan is an equity scheme managed by quant Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 29.82%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 22.86% and 44.98% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 2 of the last 2 reported years. The total expense ratio is 1.13% on assets of ₹30,361Cr. The fund is currently managed by Yug Tibrewal, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Value on the 3x3 equity style box, with 80% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-05-29.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Energy | 9.47% |
| RBL BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 4.75% |
| HFCL LIMITED | Technology | 3.44% |
| SUN TV NETWORK LIMITED | Communication Services | 2.92% |
| ANAND RATHI WEALTH LIMITED | Financial Services | 2.81% |
| ASTER DM HEALTHCARE LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.61% |
| ADANI GREEN ENERGY LIMITED | Utilities | 2.20% |
| ADANI ENTERPRISES LIMITED | Energy | 2.19% |
| POLY MEDICURE LIMITED | Healthcare | 2.17% |
| ARVIND LIMITED | Consumer Cyclical | 1.94% |
| BIKAJI FOODS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | Consumer Defensive | 1.93% |
| Capri Global Capital Limited | Financial Services | 1.93% |
| AEGIS LOGISTICS LIMITED | Energy | 1.84% |
| WELSPUN CORP LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.80% |
| ICICI BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.77% |
| Ventive Hospitality Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 1.72% |
| BAYER CROPSCIENCE LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.63% |
| USHA MARTIN LIMITED | Basic Materials | 1.59% |
| NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED | Industrials | 1.48% |
| MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.44% |
| PFIZER LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.42% |
| Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 1.35% |
| THE KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED | Financial Services | 1.30% |
| STRIDES PHARMA SCIENCE LIMITED | Healthcare | 1.23% |
| WELSPUN ENTERPRISES LIMITED | Industrials | 1.16% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Services | 9 | 18.22% |
| Healthcare | 13 | 14.42% |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | — | 11.50% |
| Power | — | 6.66% |
| Capital Goods | — | 5.40% |
| Construction | — | 5.31% |
| Consumer Services | — | 5.15% |
| Fast Moving Consumer Goods | — | 4.13% |
| Telecommunication | — | 3.44% |
| Textiles | — | 3.31% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -10.83% | 2.46% | 28.02% | 61.62% | 201.14% | 81.0% |
| 3Y | 16.85% | 22.86% | 29.83% | 44.98% | 65.26% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 20.99% | 24.70% | 32.58% | 36.87% | 49.84% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 34.5% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
What an investor SIPping into this fund actually got during named market shocks.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 7 data points.