Loading mutual fund details…
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - IDCW Option is a hybrid scheme managed by Edelweiss Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 11.75%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 10.46% and 13.05% respectively. The total expense ratio is 0.50% on assets of ₹3,627Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mr. Bhavesh Jain, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -7.21% | 0.65% | 8.99% | 22.63% | 43.10% | 79.2% |
| 3Y | 7.40% | 10.46% | 11.75% | 13.05% | 16.12% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 6.72% | 8.45% | 10.94% | 13.08% | 14.80% | 100.0% |
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 4 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|