Loading mutual fund details…
Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-Regular Plan-Growth Option is a solution scheme managed by Tata Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 7.34%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 6.88% and 8.11% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 3 of the last 12 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 2.18% on assets of ₹164Cr. The fund is currently managed by Sonam Udasi, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Growth on the 3x3 equity style box, with 100% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-04-30.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd | Financial Services | 1.17% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited | Financial Services | 0.63% |
| Billionbrains Garage Ventures Limited | Financial Services | 0.51% |
| Fujiyama Power Systems Limited | Technology | 0.42% |
| Adani Power Limited | Utilities | 0.38% |
| Shriram Finance Limited | Financial Services | 0.31% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Markets | 2 | 4.38% |
| Banks | 1 | 3.14% |
| Finance | 1 | 1.86% |
| Consumer Durables | 3 | 1.86% |
| Chemicals & Petrochemicals | 1 | 1.69% |
| Food Products | 3 | 1.55% |
| Industrial Products | 3 | 1.42% |
| Petroleum Products | 1 | 1.41% |
| Consumable Fuels | 1 | 1.13% |
| IT - Software | 3 | 1.10% |
| Retailing | 1 | 1.10% |
| Diversified FMCG | 1 | 1.07% |
| Household Products | 1 | 0.84% |
| Transport Infrastructure | 1 | 0.82% |
| Electrical Equipment | 1 | 0.79% |
| Agricultural Food & other Products | 1 | 0.75% |
| Beverages | 1 | 0.75% |
| Auto Components | 1 | 0.61% |
| Oil | 1 | 0.58% |
| Realty | 1 | 0.41% |
| Power | 1 | 0.38% |
| Healthcare Services | 1 | 0.37% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 1 | 0.30% |
| Automobiles | 1 | 0.29% |
| Aerospace & Defense | 1 | 0.28% |
| Diversified | 1 | 0.23% |
| Diversified Metals | 1 | 0.13% |
Active bets vs the average Solution fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -2.60% | 2.84% | 7.06% | 12.18% | 16.05% | 93.3% |
| 3Y | 5.99% | 6.88% | 7.34% | 8.11% | 10.26% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 5.41% | 6.26% | 7.01% | 7.66% | 8.79% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 3.4% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Solution.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.