Loading mutual fund details…
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Regular Plan - Growth Option is a hybrid scheme managed by Edelweiss Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 18.14%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 16.40% and 19.59% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 7 of the last 12 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 1.91% on assets of ₹3,627Cr. The fund is currently managed by Mr. Bhavesh Jain, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Growth on the 3x3 equity style box, with 82% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-04-30.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| Bajaj Finance Limited | Financial Services | 1.83% |
| Billionbrains Garage Ventures Limited | Financial Services | 1.09% |
| Swiggy Pvt Ltd | Consumer Cyclical | 0.99% |
| Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd | Financial Services | 0.98% |
| Varun Beverages Ltd | Consumer Defensive | 0.71% |
| Indian Bank | Financial Services | 0.68% |
| Canara Bank | Financial Services | 0.62% |
| V2 Retail Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 0.49% |
| Bharti Hexacom Limited | Communication Services | 0.42% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited | Financial Services | 0.22% |
| Union Bank of India | Financial Services | 0.19% |
| Bharat Dynamics Limited | Industrials | 0.04% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 4 | 15.30% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 8 | 6.42% |
| Telecom - Services | 1 | 4.79% |
| Finance | 1 | 4.68% |
| Petroleum Products | 3 | 4.14% |
| Retailing | 2 | 3.56% |
| Automobiles | 5 | 3.55% |
| Capital Markets | 2 | 3.12% |
| IT - Software | 4 | 2.42% |
| Power | 1 | 2.32% |
| Auto Components | 5 | 2.02% |
| Construction | 1 | 1.84% |
| Diversified FMCG | 2 | 1.71% |
| Consumer Durables | 3 | 1.66% |
| Electrical Equipment | 1 | 1.59% |
| Chemicals & Petrochemicals | 3 | 1.52% |
| Ferrous Metals | 2 | 1.51% |
| Transport Services | 2 | 1.50% |
| Non - Ferrous Metals | 1 | 1.29% |
| Realty | 2 | 1.27% |
| Healthcare Services | 2 | 1.27% |
| Aerospace & Defense | 1 | 1.23% |
| Agricultural Food & other Products | 3 | 1.13% |
| Industrial Products | 3 | 0.98% |
| Fertilizers & Agrochemicals | 2 | 0.84% |
| Beverages | 1 | 0.71% |
| Cement & Cement Products | 2 | 0.69% |
| Oil | 1 | 0.58% |
| Transport Infrastructure | 1 | 0.47% |
| Agricultural, Commercial & Construction Vehicles | 1 | 0.42% |
| Commercial Services & Supplies | 1 | 0.28% |
| Insurance | 1 | 0.21% |
| Leisure Services | 1 | 0.06% |
| Food Products | 1 | 0.06% |
Active bets vs the average Hybrid fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -2.10% | 6.35% | 14.86% | 29.71% | 53.29% | 99.1% |
| 3Y | 13.36% | 16.40% | 18.14% | 19.59% | 23.27% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 12.81% | 14.65% | 17.46% | 19.83% | 22.00% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 8.0% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Hybrid.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 4 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|