Loading mutual fund details…
BANDHAN LIQUID Fund - Regular Plan - Growth is a debt scheme managed by Bandhan Mutual Fund. Three-year compounded annual return is 6.81%, placing it in the 53rd percentile of Debt peers. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 5 of the last 12 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 0.23% on assets of ₹17,354Cr. The fund is currently managed by Brijesh Shah, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
| Holding | Sector | Weight |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Sundaram Finance Limited | Financial Services | 1.53% |
| Godrej Consumer Products Limited | Consumer Defensive | 1.43% |
| Tata Steel Limited | Basic Materials | 1.43% |
| REC Limited | Financial Services | 1.14% |
| Reliance Industries Limited | Energy | 1.14% |
| Network18 Media & Investments Limited | Communication Services | 0.57% |
| Bank of India | Financial Services | 0.57% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited | Financial Services | 0.57% |
| Canara Bank | Financial Services | 0.29% |
| Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd | Financial Services | 0.29% |
| Bank of Baroda | Financial Services | 0.29% |
| Godrej Properties Limited | Real Estate | 0.28% |
| Aditya Birla Capital Limited | Financial Services | 0.28% |
| HDFC Bank Limited | Financial Services | 0.14% |
| Union Bank of India | Financial Services | 0.14% |
| Axis Bank Limited | Financial Services | 0.14% |
| Indian Bank | Financial Services | 0.14% |
| Bajaj Finance Limited | Financial Services | 0.14% |
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 9.0% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Debt.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|