Loading mutual fund details…
Nippon India Large Cap Fund- Growth Plan -Growth Option is an equity scheme managed by Nippon India Mutual Fund. Over rolling three-year windows since inception, investors earned a median compounded return of 21.97%, with the bottom and top quartiles at 18.92% and 24.90% respectively. It has ranked in the top half of its category for 9 of the last 12 reported years. Risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio) is 0.00. The total expense ratio is 3.51% on assets of ₹51,690Cr. The fund is currently managed by Bhavik Dave, appointed within the last year.
Lower is better.
This scheme classifies as Large-Value on the 3x3 equity style box, with 95% of its portfolio classified as of 2026-04-30.
| Holding | Sector |
|---|
| Window | Min | P25 | Median |
|---|
Point-in-time CAGRs cherry-pick a single start date. The chart below shows the distribution of every possible rolling start over the fund's history, so you see the range of investor outcomes — not just one date's number.
Backtested SIP outcomes across both rolling-window scenarios and named historical stress events (COVID, Election uncertainty, Russia/Ukraine, etc.), plus per-manager alpha during their tenure on this scheme.
Same fund, monthly SIPs over rolling 1/3/5-year windows.
| Scheme | AMC | AUM | TER | 3Y |
|---|
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor (ARN-314872) and APMI member (APRN-01658). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Star ratings on this page reflect a 3-year category-quartile position computed in-house and are educational only.
Mutual fund schemes are subject to market risk. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MintByte is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-314872). MintByte does not issue buy/sell recommendations on specific securities — the site is an educational data and analytics platform. Not investment advice. Methodology · How we earn.
In-house derivations using 3-year daily NAV vs benchmark. See methodology.
| Weight |
|---|
| HDFC Bank Limited | Financial Services | 9.24% |
| ICICI Bank Limited | Financial Services | 7.99% |
| Reliance Industries Limited | Energy | 4.30% |
| Axis Bank Limited | Financial Services | 3.83% |
| Bajaj Finance Limited | Financial Services | 3.63% |
| Larsen & Toubro Limited | Industrials | 3.42% |
| GE Vernova T&D India Limited | Industrials | 2.90% |
| Infosys Limited | Technology | 2.77% |
| ITC Limited | Consumer Defensive | 2.74% |
| Hindustan Unilever Limited | Consumer Defensive | 2.61% |
| Avenue Supermarts Limited | Consumer Defensive | 2.48% |
| Maruti Suzuki India Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 2.47% |
| Tata Consultancy Services Limited | Technology | 2.39% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 2.39% |
| State Bank of India | Financial Services | 2.39% |
| NTPC Limited | Utilities | 2.16% |
| Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited | Healthcare | 2.13% |
| Tata Power Company Limited | Utilities | 1.94% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited | Financial Services | 1.49% |
| Samvardhana Motherson International Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 1.49% |
| Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited | Healthcare | 1.37% |
| ABB India Limited | Industrials | 1.31% |
| Trent Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 1.30% |
| Tata Steel Limited | Basic Materials | 1.27% |
| Eternal Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 1.20% |
| Sector | Holdings | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 5 | 24.94% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 6 | 7.44% |
| IT - Software | 4 | 6.71% |
| Retailing | 5 | 6.58% |
| Electrical Equipment | 4 | 5.93% |
| Automobiles | 3 | 5.45% |
| Diversified FMCG | 2 | 5.35% |
| Finance | 3 | 5.14% |
| Power | 3 | 4.91% |
| Petroleum Products | 1 | 4.30% |
| Construction | 1 | 3.42% |
| Insurance | 4 | 3.15% |
| Leisure Services | 4 | 2.89% |
| Auto Components | 1 | 1.49% |
| Personal Products | 3 | 1.31% |
| Ferrous Metals | 1 | 1.27% |
| Beverages | 3 | 1.24% |
| Agricultural Food & other Products | 1 | 0.91% |
| Cement & Cement Products | 1 | 0.83% |
| Financial Technology (Fintech) | 1 | 0.81% |
| Realty | 1 | 0.68% |
| Consumer Durables | 1 | 0.65% |
| Miscellaneous | 4 | 0.51% |
| Chemicals & Petrochemicals | 1 | 0.31% |
| Entertainment | 1 | 0.21% |
Active bets vs the average Equity fund. Biggest deviations shown first.
Accent bar = fund's actual sector weight. Vertical black tick = category average for the same sector. Green overlay = overweight, dashed red = underweight. The biggest active bets show first.
How crowded into the same stocks is this fund vs the largest fund in its category?
Category leader = highest-AUM scheme in the same SEBI category. A high overlap-of-weight number means the fund is concentrated into the same names as the leader (crowded); a low one means it's genuinely differentiated.
| P75 |
|---|
| Max |
|---|
| Positive % |
|---|
| 1Y | -3.61% | 7.80% | 17.92% | 35.39% | 76.22% | 97.1% |
| 3Y | 13.25% | 18.92% | 21.97% | 24.90% | 31.76% | 100.0% |
| 5Y | 14.60% | 17.33% | 21.86% | 24.80% | 27.29% | 100.0% |
Each cell is one year. Q1 = top quartile within the AMFI category for that period. Cell label is the last two digits of the year.
Top-10 weight 43.4% means the portfolio is broad — even the top names don't dominate. Effective-N is the inverse Herfindahl index — a measure of "how many positions effectively drive the fund" after weighting. Category: Equity.
Compounding maths on a notional ₹10 lakh lumpsum at 12% gross annual return. Green bar is what you'd have without the fee; red overlay is the fee drag. Fee is constant in this scenario — actual outcomes depend on real returns and any future TER changes.
Each row is a back-tested SIP — monthly contribution over the regime's duration, no fees adjustment beyond NAV-baked TER. XIRR is the annualised IRR of those cashflows; Abs return is the absolute cash-on-cash; Max DD is the deepest drawdown experienced mid-investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Alpha is the annualised excess return vs benchmark over the manager's tenure on this scheme. Beat-benchmark = total return beat the index over the same window.
Does the fund get worse as it gets bigger? Each dot is one historical manager-tenure: AUM at tenure-end vs alpha delivered during that tenure.
Correlation is too weak to confirm or rule out capacity-driven alpha decay. Re-evaluate as more manager-tenure data accumulates.
Each dot is one manager-tenure: X = AUM at tenure end, Y = alpha during that tenure. Connecting line in chronological order. Pearson r measures the linear relationship between AUM and alpha across the historical record. n = 2 data points.
| 5Y |
|---|
| Star |
|---|